My life is ruined
Love how he acts like Australians don’t speak english
they don’t
My life is ruined
Love how he acts like Australians don’t speak english
they don’t
We all have different abilities and strengths, but here are some exercises that I do 5 times a week (note that I have myopathy, a neuromuscular disease that makes me physically weak and unable to do some basic activities). I do all of these while sitting in an armchair.
I’m sure I’ll add more to my routine in time, but even just this gets me 10000x times more active than I have been in the past. If you’ve got a muscular disease or limited mobility like me, maybe try out some of these (but be careful). Take care of yourself.
Feminists don’t wanna live in a world without men, we want to live in a world without patriarchy and violent, toxic hyper-masculinity
So a world where men can’t be themselves.
Being violent and overly masculine is men “being themselves”? Sounds like you’re the one who wants to demonize men
THIS. christ, i am so here for the option of being a man who can nurture kids, and make squeaky noises over cute animals, and not have to constantly present myself as some kind of hard-hearted, aggressive asshole to keep from being beat down by other men who are afraid of getting Teh Ghey on them. toxic masculinity is TERRIBLE for men, and i refuse to participate in it.
which means, as a man, it’s beneficial for me to hang out with feminists as much as possible. they’re the ones who’ll let me be myself, not insecure dudebros who are so scared someone will see through their hyper-masculine facade that they’ll attack any guy who doesn’t front that way.
evil feminists: we believe that men can be good and kind and experience a full range of human emotions and desires and sexualities while also treating their fellow human beings of all genders with compassion and respect
heroic dude: not all men
Toxic/Hyper masculinity is watching a friend of mine being mocked and shamed for crying when his big sister died. Because men don’t cry, apparently, they should punch something instead. When his cousin was told he had to stop playing piano and pick up an ‘less sissy’ instrument, and that preferring soccer to football was ‘wimpy’ and made him ‘basically a girl’. It’s when a grown man in a tow truck CRIES when he breaks down and tells me how his divorce is going, because he doesn’t feel like he can talk about it with any of his guy friends and he doesn’t feel like he’s allowed to be friends with women, so he’s been bottling up all his sadness and worry about his family breaking apart and his kids struggling to handle it. And then reacts with shame after because he should “be a man” about it and “just suck it up”. No one should be forced to bottle up emotions to the point where one kind question from a stranger unleashes a decade or more of emotions locked away.
That’s the kind of thing we want to change. It’s fine to like football or not to react to sadness with tears. But we don’t want all men to be forced into having to do things one way to be considered ‘real men’. Those should be choices, not requirements.
The point isn’t that all masculinity is toxic. Masculinity is fine! But when people are forced to be hyper masculine it’s a problem.
Your future self is watching you right now through memories.
not if i drink enough alcohol! take that you prying creep
There seems to be a virus or some sort of malware going around causing blogs to “send out” chat messages to blogs that they follow asking for help with the purchase of certain items through donations of seemingly small amounts using bitcoin and adds a link to the message.
The message goes as following (at least the first message I got went like this): “Hi there buddy. I need help, I’m trying to buy a laptop and I can’t afford it. I’m about 0.36$ short, and I’d really appreciate if you could help me and transfer some money to me via bitcoin using this *link*.”
The small details in the message seems to have a few variations with the greeting, amount and purchased item showing up in different variations from formal to friendly, from 0.016 to 2$ and from a phone case to a laptop among others.
The blogs that are affected send out the messages to blogs that they follow for a long time mostly, so you are most likely to receive the message from a long time, active follower whose name you might recognize or a mutual etc. The blogs that are affected are not spam bots but actual active followers who follow the recipient for months or years and most likely the blogger who “sent” the message is unaware of the message being sent.
Opening up the link will cause the virus to spread even more and infect your computer/mobile with any sort of malware.
If you have received a message of that sort from this blog please know that it was not sent by me or within my control and ignore/delete the message without clicking the link.
the only topic i am 100% a centrist about is cats vs dogs because they’re both good and theres no argument they both love you so dont fight
You, like myself, may have heard a buzz about autistic people boycotting the recently-published nonfiction novel To Siri With Love. Seeing the controversy surrounding this publication, I decided to take a short break from my university assignments and do a little research for myself about the book and the issues it raises, hoping to be able to explain in short why the #BoycottToSiri movement is so important to the autistic community. The book is a memoir written by Judith Newman about her experiences with her autistic son, Gus. That alone is not a bad concept, but some of the comments the author makes send nasty shivers down my spine. To start with, here’s some of the smaller problems that were discovered:
Now we get onto the main problem of To Siri With Love, and it concerns the topic of eugenics. In the novel, Newman declared that she wanted to get Power of Attorney so that she could force her son to have a vasectomy so he couldn’t have children, so that she could have “one less worry. For [her.]” She then asked how she could make such a comment “without sounding like a eugenicist,” which only makes it worse by highlighting that she understands the horrific concept of eugenics. She then explains the unpleasant history of eugenics, acknowledging how “the history of disability is inextricably intertwined with the history of euthanizing and enforced sterilization,” but admits that she would still be “the first in line to sign him up.”
I hope this explanation sheds some light onto the problematic nature of this memoir and the ableist commentary within it. Please, if you want to read a real-life story about autistic life, do yourself a favour and read any one of the countless memoirs by members of the autistic community instead of the undeniable ableism presented by Judith Newman.
(Quotes are taken from screenshots of the book posted to Twitter by disability inclusion advocate Andrea Pregel, as well as from a tweet by Elizabeth Roderick and a screenshot from Amythest Schaber.)
Why didn’t she just title it “I hate my son”